Why Beyonce’s Ivy Park – Adidas Partnership Has Struggled

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on whatsapp

by Dan Runcie

Every week, Trapital's free memo will give you insights on the latest moves in music, media, and culture. Join 32K+ readers who stay ahead of all the trends:

This week’s Trapital memo is brought to you by trac.

Give fans exclusive access before anyone else

In my previous newsletter, I touched on windowing – how it can be a smart tactic for artists and help build the relationship they have with their fans. What if you could market your music leveraging both Web 2.0 and Web 3.0?

trac is the solution to make this happen.

trac hosts a streamlined form of music distribution (across all DSPs), on-demand merch capabilities, monetizable artist pages, and diverse payouts. This summer, it’s launching NFT features that allow artists to release their music to die-hard fans as NFTs (free to fans) before distributing their music more broadly to streaming services. NFTs don’t have to be for commercial gain.

trac bridges Web 2.0 and 3.0 with ease and has made it their mission to help artists understand and execute in both worlds. Want to learn more about how trac can help you and your artists serve their fans? Learn more about trac here.

the Ivy Park problem

When Beyonce and Adidas teamed up on Ivy Park in 2019, it seemed like the sky was the limit. Beyonce wanted a partner that offered creative control. Adidas wanted to replicate Yeezy’s massive success. Even sneaker analyst Matt Powell, who is usually skeptical of celebrity influence on apparel lines, once predicted that Ivy Park could surpass Yeezy for Adidas.

But the recent Wall Street Journal report of a 50% sales decline and a $200 million drop in Adidas’ sales projections brought a series of challenges to light. There were uninspired drops, less enthused customers, and creative tension. It’s a reminder that even the most powerful celebrities still need product-market fit and alignment with business partners to succeed.

“the next Yeezy” never happened

The Ivy Park – Adidas contract is set to expire at the end of this year, but I doubt that it continues. The Wall Street Journal said that Parkwood Entertainment, Ivy Park’s parent company, and the team at Adidas weren’t on the same page. It wouldn’t be the first time Adidas and its talent partners have been at odds.

A few months ago, Kanye West voiced frustrations about Adidas’ control and decision-making over Yeezy releases. Ye’s critiques didn’t get much airtime due to his antisemitic comments and other controversies, but the tension was there. Beyonce’s not the type to publicly call out a business partner like Ye is, but her public persona also felt less tied to Ivy Park’s than Ye’s was to Yeezy.

When Adidas and Yeezy were at their best, Kanye was all the way tapped in. He brought fans behind the scenes through social media posts. Even the Yeezy prototypes were in high demand. Ye brought Forbes inside his home to see his countless designs. It was like visiting a famous painter’s house and seeing their unfinished paintings around the house.

Unfortunately, Ivy Park never got there with Adidas. Outside of the initial launch with Adidas, there weren’t many Beyonce interviews dedicated to Ivy Park, or her bringing fans under the hood to see the next drop. But to be fair, that’s never been Beyonce’s brand.

Here’s what a Beyhive member “since the House of Dereon days” said:

”She’s more of an artistic god than an aspirational figure. We know nothing about her day to day lifestyle and her icon status benefits from that…Her ability to retain mystery is a rare currency.”

Another fan, Maella from France, said.

“It doesn’t feel like Beyoncé herself would wear the brand to work out…People want to buy an experience, Ivy Park has yet to deliver the experience.”

It’s very difficult to push a celebrity-influenced direct-to-consumer product in the social media era without that celebrity promoting the brand in an accessible way.

The most influential figures still need alignment

It’s time to update the Beyonce sales funnel

The high demand for Beyonce The Performer lines up with her exclusive, limited positioning. She rented out the Louvre to make a music video. She sells Tiffany & Co jewelry in front of never-before-seen Basquiat paintings. She gets paid eight figures to perform at private events for the richest people around the world. Her fans will hop on planes and get their passports stamped to see the Renaissance tour. Beyonce is a Veblen good.

That positioning is great for high-end concert tickets, but it’s difficult for an accessible athleisure brand.

I heard from a few Beyonce fans who said that the drops felt “repetitive,” “uninspired,” and didn’t feel like something Beyonce herself would wear. They rarely saw her wearing the brand outside of promotional Instagram posts.

Misalignment can get overlooked because of the power of Beyonce overall, but even artists who have had success with DTC brands can struggle elsewhere. Rihanna’s Fenty Maison was a historic achievement when announced, but it was suspended less than a year later. Here’s what I wrote in February 2021 when the suspension of the brand was announced:

“When the LVMH deal was first announced in May 2019, I was all in. I thought it was another signal of the growing bond between hip-hop and high fashion, and the push for inclusivity in luxury. But I overlooked LVMH’s misalignment on affordability. Fenty was out here selling $870 hoodies! Shoes that cost more than red bottoms?? In a pandemic?!

No. These are not reaching the same customer.”

LVMH’s Fenty clothing line was a departure from what made Fenty Beauty and Savage X Fenty billion-dollar success stories. They were for women of all shades and shapes. Both brands were inclusive, which lines up with the external image of Rihanna. She replies to online comments, calls haters out, smokes weed, and cheers for her favorite teams. She seems more like one of us.

Another Beyonce fan, Reni in Lagos, summed it up well:

“B has taken the more guarded route of music first, and largely, music only. Know me through my gift and the musical/visual outputs I present to you. And to be honest, that’s more than enough. Unless you want to push products outside of that gift… then you’re gonna run into low adoption.”

Every artist’s funnel is different

Sure, Ivy Park could be in a slightly better position if both business partners were aligned. But the products, the celebrity, and the fans also need to be aligned too.

Beyonce has a gift, talent, and work ethic that has reaped its rewards in music and live performances. She’s top two and she’s not two. Ivy Park may not become the next Yeezy, but it’s a helpful reminder of what artists can and can’t sell effectively.

The Beyhive will clearly spend thousands of dollars on a destination trip to see her perform. They may spend hundreds of dollars on vinyls and merch. They have even spent ten dollars on Tidal or HBO to watch and listen to Lemonade. Ivy Park not working out is an unfortunate problem, but in the big picture, it’s a good problem to have.

Dan Runcie

Dan Runcie

Founder of Trapital

Want more? Trapital's free Monday memo will keep you posted on the latest trends in the business of music, media, and culture:

Like this memo? Share it!

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on whatsapp
Share on email
"The stuff that Trapital puts out is fantastic. Really interesting insights into the industry, artists trends, and market trends."
Mike Weissman
Former CEO, SoundCloud
“You tell the true stories. Not just the end product, but how you get to the end product. Your point of view on it is dope.”
Steve Stoute
CEO, UnitedMasters and Translation